Russia Hits Ukraine With New Missile With Multiple Warheads
Probably not an ICBM, but the dreaded intermediate-range weapon perfect for hitting NATO Europe
Last night Russia missile-bombed the old Yuzhmash Soviet missile plant in Dnipro, Ukraine. The missile was fired from Volgograd, 800 kilometers away, and delivered multiple warheads. Both of these aspects are novel. We’ve never seen such a weapon used in this war before, which raises the question of what it was.
Until 2019 Russia was limited by the INF treaty which banned ground-launched missiles in the 500-5500 kilometer range. As a consequence, Russia has many Iskanders with a 500 km range and ICBMs with a range over 5500 km, but we don’t know of a Russian missile with an 800 km range.
Ukraine says the weapon was an ICBM the Russians fired on a lofted trajectory, but the US disagrees. I think in this case the Americans with their satellites are in a better position to judge. Also, the ICBM claim mostly centers on it being the RS-26 “Rubezh” missile, but that program was mothballed in 2018.
If it wasn’t an ICBM that leaves two options. One is that since 2019 Russia has raced to develop a medium-range ballistic missile, or that it has imported them from abroad.
Iran has medium-range missiles that deliver multiple warheads, and has indeed just recently used them against Israel. However, the West only accuses Iran of providing Russia with the very short-range Fath 360 missile, not of anything capable of making the distance from Kaputsin Yar to Dnipro. Also Iran is perhaps not in the best position to be sharing its stockpile of weapons capable of reaching Israel with another power presently.
This leaves a previously unknown domestic medium-range missile as perhaps the likeliest option.
Moscow did say that the expansion of ATACMS and Storm Shadow strikes into western Russia would be answered with the use of a new weapon not yet seen in this war, and now it has delivered.
Hurling an ICBM on a special trajectory at a defense plant in eastern Ukraine is quite bombastic, but it isn’t cost-effective or sustainable. It’s a one-off, a circus shot that you won’t be doing much of.
A revelation that you have access to a new type of Iranian missile would be a lot more significant for the war’s trajectory. However as a show of force, saber-rattling with imported products doesn’t exactly scream strength for a great power.
On the other hand, a demonstration that five years since the INF death has been enough time to develop and field medium-range ballistic missiles — weapons that would be perfect for striking NATO in Europe in a cost-effective way — would be an eyebrow-raiser with considerable substance.
However, if it is domestic and new, then the question is if it already exists in quantities that can have a large effect on the present campaign in Ukraine and the answer is probably no.
UPDATE: Just after I published this Putin went on TV for a national address and revealed the weapon was indeed a previously undisclosed medium-range ballistic missile “Oreshnik”.
The massively well-known Substacks will be fine whether you personally back them or not. Paying them will let you to get behind their paywall, but won’t move the needle on how much they can publish, or if they can stick around or not.
But a $5 pledge to Anti-Empire really does make a difference of this sort. With a paid subscription you’re meaningfully influencing whether Anti-Empire can stay around and at what frequency.
31 of you are already backing AE, thanks to each of you!
Guess it was a bad idea to stage a bloody coup back in 2014 maybe? The west keeps pushing its weapons right up to russias doorstep...how would americans react? What if Russia staged a blood coup in Canada...installed an aggressive angry puppet...and began flooding the country with weapons aimed at you? Then attacked you with an army from the north that they spent years training and arming. How would you react? Introspection is difficult, but try. And then stop trying to stop wars all around the world.
Will showing that they have a new way to blow stuff up in Ukraine be deemed by Russia a sufficient response to the unleashing of the ATACMS and Storm Shadows, vis-à-vis imposing a cost for the decision on the U.S./NATO?