Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Passer by's avatar

You are omitting some details in order to paint black pictures instead of realistic pictures. For example i noticed that the evacuation of the vast majority of Kherson's residents was not mentioned in your article about it, which was on the issue of people left behind.

I noticed things of that nature in other articles too.

Fully black or fully white pictures are an objectivity warning to me.

I also noticed the despair of your commenters. The people giving up. I do not like this. There are ways to bring bad news without making people give up. If the purpose behind your writings is to make people give up, you are certainly doing that well. That would also mean that you are their enemy, of course.

I had trouble with the 5D crowd way before the war started, which does not mean that i won't criticise the other side either.

99 % of the articles are Russia negative in one form or another. This percentage is too high and that is not normal. One possible reason could be that Russia did not live up to the writer's expectations so he is angry about it, and lashes out in return.

Regardless of the validity of those emotions, i'm not interested in the bias they bring in.

I'm not interested in 99 % negative articles just like i'm not interested in 99 % positive articles.

I'm interested in more objective articles and not bias, whatever the direction of it. So for now i will wait and see.

Expand full comment
Based Florida Man's avatar

Thanks for the reporting. It's hard to find good info, so thanks!

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts